Legal Opinion · Dissent

Disciplinary Counsel v. Curry

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 2006No. 2006-1178Published

1DissentLundberg Stratton, J.

{¶ 24} For the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in Disciplinary Counsel v. Geer, 112 Ohio St.3d 124, 2006-0hio-6516, 858 N.E.2d 388, I dissent and would leave respondent’s sanction as an interim suspension, rather than a finite suspension. As soon as respondent becomes current on his arrearage and current on his child-support obligations, I would allow him to provide proof of doing so and permit him to apply to be reinstated on the condition that he proves compliance with all the requirements imposed in this court’s interim suspension order. In so doing, respondent would be able to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. GeerOhio Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API