In Re Estate of Harmston
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Concurrence
Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE STOUDER
specially concurring:
I agree with the result reached by the majority of the court to the extent that they affirm the judgment of the trial court on its merits. I disagree with the majority’s holding that appellant lacks standing to appeal the judgment of the trial court and if such holding be regarded as the rule in this case then consistently the appeal should have been dismissed rather than judgment affirmed. Where a court is requested to approve a proposed sale initiated by or on behalf of an officer of the court the issue is presented as to whether the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Evans v. HunoldIllinois Supreme Court · 1946
- Ryerson v. AplandIllinois Supreme Court · 1941
- Quigley v. BreckenridgeIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
- Jennings v. DunphyIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- McCallum v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1903
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.