Legal Opinion

State v. Blaha

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 2019No. S-18-912PublishedCited by 84 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCassel, J.

I. INTRODUCTION

Through new counsel, Ryan W. Blaha appeals his criminal convictions and sentences, attacking the sentences imposed and asserting ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Regarding his sentences, we (1) again reject the premise that sentences within statutory limits are never excessive, (2) dispel the notion that sentencing factors have not been adequately considered without specific discussion, and (3) reiterate that a sentencing court may consider a defendant's conduct underlying dismissed charges. Although the record does not allow us to reach one of his four ineffectiveness…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. MrzaNebraska Supreme Court · 2019
  3. State v. IrishNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State v. FilholmNebraska Supreme Court · 2014
  5. State v. AllenNebraska Supreme Court · 2018

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by84 opinions

  1. State v. GuzmanNebraska Supreme Court · 2020
  2. State v. LeeNebraska Supreme Court · 2019
  3. State v. IddingsNebraska Supreme Court · 2020
  4. State v. MartinezNebraska Supreme Court · 2020
  5. State v. VazquezNebraska Supreme Court · 2025

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API