Bartley Scow Corp. v. J. V. Petrie & Son, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SWAN, Circuit Judge.
There is no dispute as to the facts. The scow was orally chartered by the libelant to the respondent Petrie & Son, and was subehartered by it to the Hygrade Company upon the same terms. Nothing is shown as to such terms except that the hire was $12 per day, and a bargee went with the scow. It passed directly from the libelant’s possession into that of the subeharterer, and the libelant knew it was to be used to carry ashes. The subeharterer sent the scow to the sugar company’s dock at the foot of South Second street, Brooklyn, where ashes were loaded on it from a chute.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. Loveman Compress Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Flinn v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
- McCullen v. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
- General Insurance Co. of America v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Wallace v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- John Rooff & Sons, Inc. v. WinterbottomSupreme Court of Iowa · 1957
- Connecticut Fire Ins. v. Lake Transfer Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
- John Rooff & Sons, Inc. v. WinterbottomSupreme Court of Iowa · 1957