Legal Opinion

NantWorks, LLC v. Niantic, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided January 13, 2023No. 3:20-cv-06262Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 San Francisco Division 11 NANTWORKS, LLC, et al., Case No. 20-cv-06262-LB 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS 13 v. Re: ECF No. 140 14 NIANTIC, INC., 15 Defendant. 16 17 INTRODUCTION 18 NantWorks sued Niantic for infringing NantWorks’ patents in Niantic’s augmented-reality 19 (AR) game apps Pokémon Go and Harry Potter: Wizards Unite. Both games use the camera and 20 GPS system on a mobile device and an AR platform to superimpose AR objects onto digital 21 representations of a…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  2. Enfish, LLC v. Microsoft CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
  3. Bilski v. KapposSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. Electric Power Group, LLC v. Alstom S.A.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
  5. Content Extraction & Transmission LLC v. Wells Fargo BankCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API