Legal Opinion

In re the Assignment of Roberg & Co.

Ohio Circuit Courts

Decided January 15, 1899Published

Heard on motion to dismiss appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

H. K. Roberg & Co., a partnership composed of Roberg, Schrorer & Meehan, by deed assigned its property to Jerome D. Creed for the benefit of its creditors. The deed was filed in the court of insolvency of Hamilton county, Ohio. Greed qualified and was acting as assignee, when Meehan,one of the partners, filed his motion to set aside the deed of assignment on the ground that he had not signed it. The court having overruled his motion, Meehan appeals directly to this court, basing his right to do so upon the act of April 25th 1898, 93 O. L., 669, which amends sections 9 and 13 of the original…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Huston v. CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1856
  2. Dawson v. EusticeIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  3. McClain v. WilliamsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API