Legal Opinion

Weeger v. Mueller

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 23, 1902PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Edward F. Dunne, Judge presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Waterman

The instruments offered in evidence, unless payable to bearer or to some person therein named, are not promissory notes. Walters v. Short, 5 Gil. 252-259; Mayo v. Chenoweth, Breese, 200; Smith v. Bridges, Breese, 18; Adams v. King, 16 Ill. 169.

If the instruments can be construed as promises to pay the International Loan and Investment Union, see Adams v. King, 16 Ill. 169; neither of them was indorsed by it, and hence no recovery could be had thereon by appellant.

The statute does not permit an amendment substituting a new party for the one in whose name a suit is brought.

The court properly…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Adams v. KingIllinois Supreme Court · 1854

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Workman v. WorkmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API