Magtab Publishing Corp. v. Howard
District Court, W.D. Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
BEN C. DAWKINS, Jr., Chief Judge.
This is another of the many controversies arising from the well-intentioned efforts of local governmental authorities to cleanse the newsstands of morally objectionable magazines so as to protect young people from exposure to obscene, indecent, immoral, filthy, lewd, sexually indecent, or lascivious influences. As is almost always the case, the actions of those so worthily motivated have evoked charges here, from the publishers of the *66magazines under attack, that their rights under the First Amendment— freedom of the press — and the Fourteenth Amendment — to…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Near v. Minnesota Ex Rel. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Lovell v. City of GriffinSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Thomas v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bantam Books, Inc. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Familias Unidas v. BriscoeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Familias Unidas v. BriscoeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Bantam Books, Inc. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- MAGTAB PUBLISHING CORPORATION v. HowardDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1959