Thompson v. Barton Gulch Mining Co.
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Galen
This is an adverse action involving a conflict in the mining locations of the plaintiff and the defendant, comprising fifty-three one-hundredths of an acre. The plaintiff rests his claim to the area in conflict upon a location by him made September 1, 1915, of “the Metalie quartz lode, mining claim,” and the defendant bases its right thereto upon a location made June 2, 1903, by its predecessors in interest,- of “the Marietta quartz lode mining claim.” The action was instituted to *195determine the conflict in consequence of the defendant having applied for patent to “the Marietta claim.” The…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Book v. Justice Min. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1893
- Erhardt v. BoaroSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Butte City Water Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Gleeson v. Martin White Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1878
- Flynn Group Mining Co. v. MurphyIdaho Supreme Court · 1910
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Robinson v. LaffonMontana Supreme Court · 1957