Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Barton Gulch Mining Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1922No. 4,732PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Galen

This is an adverse action involving a conflict in the mining locations of the plaintiff and the defendant, comprising fifty-three one-hundredths of an acre. The plaintiff rests his claim to the area in conflict upon a location by him made September 1, 1915, of “the Metalie quartz lode, mining claim,” and the defendant bases its right thereto upon a location made June 2, 1903, by its predecessors in interest,- of “the Marietta quartz lode mining claim.” The action was instituted to *195determine the conflict in consequence of the defendant having applied for patent to “the Marietta claim.” The…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Book v. Justice Min. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1893
  2. Erhardt v. BoaroSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Butte City Water Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. Gleeson v. Martin White Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Flynn Group Mining Co. v. MurphyIdaho Supreme Court · 1910

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Robinson v. LaffonMontana Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API