Legal Opinion

Devitis v. Newcomb-Endicott Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1933No. Docket No. 22, Calendar No. 30,674PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

This is an action of malicious prosecution in which plaintiff had verdict and judgment. Defendant has appealed. Plaintiff was a teacher in a public school at Detroit. She married and desired furniture for a home. She had a charge account at defendant’s store and went there for furniture, made her wants known, and was directed to the office of the credit manager, Mr. Reutter, where, on September 18,1926, she signed in blank a lease, so-called, a title-retaining contract. There is testimony that it was usual practice at the store, when goods were to go out on title-retaining contract, for the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wachsmuth v. Merchants' National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Birdsall v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Davis v. McMillanMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Weiden v. WeidenMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Swaney v. John Schlaff Creamery Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Koski v. VohsMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Wilson v. YonoMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Baker v. BarachMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Radzinski v. DoeMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Koski v. VohsMichigan Supreme Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API