Legal Opinion

Appeal of Bellingrath

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided November 12, 1925No. Docket No. 2018PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*13OPINION.

Smith:

The deficiency determined in this appeal arose from the action of the Commissioner in adding to the income reported by the taxpayer $41,127.83, which is claimed to have been income of the taxpayer’s wife as her share of the profits of an alleged partnership *14existing between herself and her husband, the taxpayer herein. The issue is whether the wife was in reality a partner in the Coca Cola companies enumerated in the findings of fact.

From the uncontroverted evidence in this appeal and from the record as it now stands, we must sustain the contention of the taxpayer that a bona…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Espy v. ComerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  2. Brewer v. BrowneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  3. Schlapback v. LongSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  4. Belser v. Tuscumbia Banking Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  5. Walton v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bellingrath v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API