McFarland v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TOM G. DAVIS, Judge.
Appeal is taken from a conviction for forgery by possession. Following his plea of guilty, appellant’s punishment was assessed at six years.
At the outset, we are confronted with fundamental error which requires reversal in the interest of justice. Art. 40.09(13), V.A.C.C.P.
The indictment under which appellant was prosecuted alleges in pertinent part that appellant did:
“... unlawfully without authority and with intent to defraud and harm, forge the writing duplicated below by possessing it with intent to utter it while knowing it was forged: ...”
It has been held that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Jiminez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Minix v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Roach v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Lee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ex Parte JohnsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Cotton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Burks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Anthony Mathew Lujan v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2016
- Ex Parte JohnsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.