Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Willis

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 2002No. 2001-2233PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} We must decide whether an attorney who permitted a ' disbarred attorney in his employ to act as if he were licensed during depositions, at a pretrial conference, and with clients should be disciplined for professional misconduct. The Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court recommended that respondent, James R. Willis of Cleveland, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0032463, be publicly reprimanded for this conduct after finding that he violated DR 1-102(A)(5) (engaging in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice) and 3-101(A) (aiding a nonlawyer…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Land Title Abstract & Trust Co. v. DworkenOhio Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. PavlikOhio Supreme Court · 2000

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. WillisOhio Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API