Legal Opinion

Hendrickson v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided April 30, 1926PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Chief Justice Thomas

Reversing.

The appellants, Hendrickson and Gray, were jointly indicted by the grand jury of Knox county, in which they were accused of the offense ‘ ‘ of having in their possession a moonshine still and parts of equipment designed and designated for the unlawful purpose of manufacturing spirituous liquor.” Upon their joint trial thereunder they were each convicted and their motion for a new trial being overruled they prosecute this appeal. Numerous grounds were incorporated in the motion for a new trial, and which were claimed to be prejudicially…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Payne v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1858
  2. Whitaker v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  3. Allen v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  4. Mobile & Ohio R. R. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906
  5. Coppage v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1868

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Berry v. GrayDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1957
  2. Bartram v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API