Legal Opinion

Brennan v. Tietsort

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1882PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Case made from Cass. Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Brennan sued Tietsort under the common: counts and filed a bill of particulars of work and labor and a few items of cash, and a steel hammer. Defendant, under the general issue, gave notice and particulars of set-off.

On the trial the court refused to allow defendant to prove any payments on plaintiff’s demand, except such items as were contained in his particulars of set-off. The case comes up chiefly on this ground.

The rule is well established that payment can always be shown under the general issue in assumpsit, although in some other forms of action it was required at common law to be…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Huntoon v. RussellMichigan Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cleveland v. RothschildMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Ringelberg v. PetersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API