Legal Opinion

Carroll v. Reuben H. Donnelly Corp.

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

Decided February 2, 1945No. 43Published

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, P. J.,

This matter comes before the court on two motions: one for a judgment non obstante veredicto and the other for a new trial. These motions were both filed by defendant.

The Reuben H. Donnelley Corporation is engaged in the business, inter alia, of obtaining advertisements from business people for the classified section of the telephone directory of the Bell Telephone Company of Pennsylvania. Plaintiff, Anthony M. Carroll, was one of the solicitors employed by it in March 1941, to secure advertisements for this directory. The agreement between the parties was an oral one. Under its…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lightcap v. KeaggySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Peniston v. John Y. Huber Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  3. Matthews v. Park Bros., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1892
  4. Matthews v. Park Bro. & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  5. Gallagher v. Wayne Steam Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API