State v. Coday
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from the Wright Circuit Court. — Hon. Angus Cox, Judge. The indictment is under the statute regulating the sale of intoxicating liquors by dramshop keepers. Laws 1891, sec. 2, p. 128. Defendant being a regular registered druggist and pharmacist is only amenable to the statute regulating the sale of intoxicating liquors by druggists. State v. Piper, 41 Mo. App. 160; State v. Gibson, 61 Id. 368; State v. Rafter, 62 Id. 101; State v. Baslcett, 52 Id. 389.
1Opinion of the CourtBland, P. J.
Appellant was indicted in the Wright county circuit court, charged with a violation of section 2, dramshop act of 1891, by having sold to one T. W. Freeman, intoxicating liquors in less quantity than three gallons without first taking out and having a license as a dramshop keeper or any *71other legal authority to make the sale. The cause was, by agreement of parties, submitted to the court sitting as a jury upon the following agreed statement of facts:
“For the purpose of a trial of this cause the following statement of facts are agreed upon as the evidence herein, to wit: It is agreed that on…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. PiperMissouri Court of Appeals · 1890
- State v. RafterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1895