Legal Opinion

Cochran v. Amsden

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1885No. 12,167PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From the Shelby Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

The appellant in his petition alleges that Elizabeth Clayton was adjudged to be a person of unsound mind on the 11th day of April, 1884, and that her reason has been restored. Prayer that her disability might be removed, and that she be declared a person of sound mind. A trial by jury resulted in a verdict against the petitioner, upon which judgment was pronounced.

There was no error in permitting the appellee to prove that Daniel Cochran, a witness called by the appellant, had expressed, out of court, an opinion different from that expressed on the witness stand. If a witness has expressed…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Potts v. HouseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1849
  2. Somers v. PumphreyIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  3. Walker v. Walker'sSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
  4. Stubbs v. HoustonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
  5. Lee v. JilsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1831

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Guardianship of Carrico v. BennettIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Shafer v. ShaferIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Ruhlman v. RuhlmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. State ex rel. Brooking v. BranyanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API