Legal Opinion

Landon v. Wm. E. Huston Drug Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 18, 1916No. 8462PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBuck, J.

After a careful examination of the record in this case, including the statement of facts, we have reached the conclusion that plaintiff’s tendered peremptory instruction should have been given by the trial court. If plaintiff was the purchaser of the notes given by defendants to the Vernon Advertising & Manufacturing Company, before maturity and for valuable consideration, and without notice of any defense or defect, he was entitled to recover thereon, even though the maker of the notes, the Win. E. Huston Drug Company, had a good defense as against the Vernon Advertising & Manufacturing…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kauffman & Runge v. RobeyTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Texas Banking & Insurance v. TurnleyTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Daniel v. SpaethCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  4. Stephens v. DavisTennessee Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Landon v. HalcombCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Iowa City State Bank v. MilfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  2. Commercial Security Co. v. HullCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  3. Temple Lumber Co. v. LowCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API