Tracie F. v. Francisco D.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partLiljeberg, J.
hi agree with the majority’s decision to shift the burden of proof from the nonpar-ent to the parent when a parent seeks to modify a non-considered custody decree. Maintaining stability in the child’s life is important and shifting the burden to the parent protects the child’s stability. I further agree with the portions of the standard adopted by the majority which require the parent to prove the elimination of the substantial harm to the child and that the requested change is in the best interest of the child.
I respectfully disagree, however, with the majority’s decision to adopt the second…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Grasser Contracting Co. v. City of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
- Cochran v. Pelican Well Tool & Supply Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1926
- Bergeron v. BergeronSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
- Ramirez v. RamirezLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
- Bowden v. BrownLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.