Legal Opinion

Samuel F. Tincher v. Otto C. Boles, Warden of the West Virginia State Penitentiary

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided August 9, 1966No. 9736PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

In this habeas corpus petition, Tincher complained that the indictment upon which he was convicted of statutory rape failed to specify the day, the month, or the year of the offense charged. Con cerned about the efficacy of the conviction as a bar to a subsequent prosecution, we appointed counsel for Tincher and have fully considered briefs, supplemental briefs and oral arguments of counsel.

Other information in the indictment supplies some limitations to the unspecificity of the allegation of the time of the offense. The indictment is in the form prescribed by statute, and the spaces for the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. McMillionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. State v. PenningtonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. State v. FriedleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1914
  4. State v. LewisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. State v. BermawitzWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. Luther James CovingtonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1969
  2. Clinebell v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1986
  3. State v. DouglasMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. State v. RuddMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. State v. HenslerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API