Legal Opinion

Gilmore v. Boening

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 2, 1934No. Gen. No. 37,331PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McSurely

Claimants in the probate court were allowed their claim in the estate of W. Henry Boening, deceased, for $1,500 as attorneys’ fees for legal services alleged to have been rendered the estate, to be paid in due course of administration. The executrix, hereafter called defendant, appealed to the circuit court; upon motion of claimants the court struck the first appeal bond filed by the defendant, but denied the motion to strike the second appeal bond and approved the same; claimants, electing to stand by their motion, introduced no evidence to support their claim; the court thereupon held…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Akin v. Southern Gem Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Hill v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Drainage Commissioners v. HarmsIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Davison v. HeinrichIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Hall v. First National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1928

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Burke v. KleimanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1934
  2. In re Estate O'DonnellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1943
  3. Schmalz v. Estate of StrangAppellate Court of Illinois · 1939
  4. In re Estate of LoughAppellate Court of Illinois · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API