Legal Opinion
United States v. Hugh Kilpatrick and Carl Kenneth Barker
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided April 10, 1972No. 18436, 18437PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GORDON, District Judge.
The appellants Kilpatrick and Barker were each found guilty by the jury under the conspiracy count and three substantive counts under an indictment which charged them and thirteen others with violating certain laws of the United States relating to counterfeit money. In addition to the conspiracy count (count 1), Kilpatrick was convicted under counts 2, 5 and 11, and Barker was convicted under counts 8, 20, and 21.
Both Kilpatrick and Barker appeal their convictions, and three principal issues are advanced. First, the defendants urge that the evidence does not establish a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Blumenthal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. Daniel Bozza, Charles Mulhearn, Ronald Jones, Michael Pizzo, Salvatore Guarnieri, Anthony Delutro, A/K/A Tony WestCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- United States v. Harry P. Hutul, Robert Sacks, Herbert Basan, Nancy Mitchell, and Vito LombardiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- United States v. Bennie Ray Winship, A/K/A Nip, and Jerry BiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. William Herman JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. BrantleyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Katherine BuckhanonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. TrieDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.