Legal Opinion

Green v. Lingo

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided August 7, 1935No. 10590PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Atkinson, Justice.

1. Assignments of error not argued or insisted upon in the brief of the attorney for the plaintiff in error will be treated by the Supreme Court as abandoned. Johnson v. State, 177 Ga. 312 (3) (170 S. E. 235) ; Wilkinson v. Smith, 179 Ga. 507 (3) (176 S. E. 373).

2. A statement of facts .in the brief of the attorney for the plaintiff in error, with request to be allowed to file a brief on the law of the ease within a definite time, will not amount to argument or. insistence upon the assignments of error made in the bill of exceptions, where no such brief is subsequently…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wilkinson v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  2. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Essig v. ChevesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
  2. Evans v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API