Legal Opinion
Bear, Stearns & Co. v. Amad
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided March 8, 1990No. Civ. A. No. H-89-86PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON RECONSIDERATION
HUGHES, District Judge.
1. Introduction.
Bear, Stearns & Co., Inc., challenges the court’s authority to order M.T. Amad’s property turned over directly to it in full satisfaction of a judgment debt. Reconsideration will be denied. The critical question is, not the direct delivery, but the full satisfaction part of the order. The delivery and the satisfaction will stand.
2. Background.
Bear-Stearns applied for extraordinary relief from the court to help it collect a judgment for $323,386.91 recovered against its ex-customer, Amad. The court set a hearing on the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ex Parte JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- Matrix, Inc. v. Provident American Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1983
- De Garza v. GarzaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bear, Stearns & Co., Inc. v. M.T. AmadCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990