Cohen v. New York Times Co.
New York Supreme Court
Action for libel,
1Opinion of the Court
■Crane, J.
The defendant published of the plaintiff, a living -person, that he was dead, and this action has been brought upon the assumption that such a false -article is libelous per se. The demurrer interp-osed to the -complaint challenges this assumption, the defendant claiming that, even if such a false notice to the public might subject the plaintiff to ridicule, yet, as death is common' to all and is no disgrace, the mistake could in no way affect his character and reputation and, therefore; -could not be libelous without proof and allegation of special damage. In other words, it is the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Morrison v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
- Cooper v. GreeleyCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
- Woodruff v. . Bradstreet Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Lamberti v. Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
- Martin v. Press Publishing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cohen v. New York Times Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
- Cohen v. New York Times Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
- Pignatelli v. Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 1922