Legal Opinion

Whiddon v. Salter

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 15, 1915PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Probate of will. Before Judge Rawlings. Washington superior court. July 30, 1914.

1Opinion of the CourtLumpkin, J.

1. Where to the probate of a will a caveat was interposed, which set up that the testatrix did not have testamentary capacity, and in connection therewith alleged that the will was unreasonable in that it gave to persons other than the husband of the testatrix, who was the caveator, a large part of the estate, it was competent to show the value of the estate left by the decedent, and of the land devised by the will, a part of which was left to the husband for life, with a remainder over.(a) In connection with the question of the reasonableness or unreasonableness of the will, it was competent…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Seabolt v. SeaboltSupreme Court of Georgia · 1964
  2. Cathey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
  3. Elliott v. GarySupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  4. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Stovall-Pace Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API