Legal Opinion

Gaibout v. Clark

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 1, 1887PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the St. Louis Circuit Court, W. H_ Horner, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRombauer, J.

The plaintiffs and the defendant entered into a contract of sale, evidenced by the following memorandum :

"St. Louis, May 26, 1885.
"J. T. Graibout and T. J. Woodward.

£ ‘ I propose to purchase your two-thirds interest in the business known as the ‘ Union Mercantile Agency ’ (formerly Merchants’ Mutual Protection and Collection Association) of the city of St. Louis, Mo., including all books, blanks, office furniture, contracts, good will of the *427business, office lease and insurance policies, and, in fact, your entire interests and control in said business, for which I will agree to pay you two…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. ShockSupreme Court of Missouri · 1878
  2. Carter v. BlackSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
  3. Smithers v. BircherMissouri Court of Appeals · 1876

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Enterprise Soap Works v. SayersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Henry Gaus & Sons Manufacturing Co. v. Magee, Lattimore & La Berge Manufacturing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. Crown Vinegar & Spice Co. v. WehrsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1894
  4. Brauckmann v. LeightonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1896
  5. Ball v. LuskMissouri Court of Appeals · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API