Legal Opinion
Matter of Rosenberg v. New York State Off. of Parks, Recreation, & Historic Preserv.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 7, 2015No. 2014-00742PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation, and Historic Preservation has no ownership interests in a certain bridle path, Andrew Rosenberg and Sandra Holden appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Hubert, J.), entered November 22, 2013, as denied their motion for leave to amend the complaint and that branch of their separate motion which was for an attorney’s fee and costs, plus $250, pursuant to Judiciary Law § 773.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Village of Willowbrook v. OlechSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Lucido v. MancusoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Bower Associates v. Town of Pleasant ValleyNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- Sonne v. Board of Trustees of Village of SuffernAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Rosenberg v. New York State Office of Parks, Recreation, & Historic PreservationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Commonwealth Land Title Insurance v. Sienna Abstract, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Palmieri v. Town of BabylonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018