Legal Opinion

State v. Grimes, 22317 (8-29-2008)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 29, 2008No. 22317PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Daniel Grimes, defendant-appellant, appeals from his conviction in the Montgomery County Common Pleas Court of two counts of aggravated robbery, two counts of aggravated burglary, two counts of felonious assault, and one count of theft of drugs. Grimes contends the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence gathered by the police in violation of his Fourth Amendment rights.

{¶ 2} The facts underlying this appeal are set out in the companion case of State v. Buford, Montgomery App. No. 22149, 2008-Ohio-2231, decided May 9, 2008, and are as follows:

{¶ 3} On…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Burdeau v. McDowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. State v. Buford, 22149 (5-9-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. DavisOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. State v. DavisOhio Court of Appeals · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API