Legal Opinion

Carroll v. Carroll

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 13, 1938No. 8 Div. 840PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The bill sought the cancellation of a conveyance alleged to be a forgery. The decree sustained the validity of this conveyance.

It was further decreed, “that the complainants are entitled to relief under that theory of the bill and prayer asking for relief on the theory that the deed dated October 31, 1932 of W. A. Carroll to Eula Carroll Woodham should be declared a mortgage. It appears that there was no present consideration for the making of this deed and that the conveyance, was based wholly on existing indebtedness and that the mortgage and notes making up almost the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. McMillan v. AikenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  2. Georgia Cotton Co. v. LeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  3. Sharpe v. OrmeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1878
  4. Brown v. Mobile Electric Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  5. Abney v. DeLoachSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Henslee v. HensleeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  2. UNITED STATES FINANCE COMPANY v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  3. Richey v. CreelCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API