Legal Opinion
United States Ex Rel. Glickfeld v. Krendel
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided December 6, 1955No. Civ. A. 440-51PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MODARELLI, District Judge.
This is an action by a sub-contractor (Glickfeld) against the prime contractor (Krendel), the latter having contracted with the United States Government for the rehabilitation of building No. 24, Naval Industrial Shipyard, located at Port Newark, New Jersey. Seaboard Surety Company is a party defendant as surety under the bond executed and delivered by Krendel, the bond being conditioned upon the prompt payment of persons supplying labor and materials pursuant to the prime contract.
Jurisdiction is based solely on 40 U.S. C.A. § 270b, 1 which provides, in substance,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lembcke v. United States (Lembcke, Third-Party-Defendants)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- Decker v. George W. Smith & Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1916
- United States Ex Rel. Harrington v. TrioneDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1951
3Cited by13 opinions
- Nevets C.M., Inc. v. Nissho Iwai American Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1989
- Chancellor, Inc. v. Hamilton Appliance Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
- Loizeaux Builders Supply Co. v. Donald B. Ludwig Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
- Markel Service, Inc. v. National Farm LinesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
- United States Ex Rel. James F. O'Neil Co. v. Malan Construction Corp.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1958
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.