Legal Opinion

Grengs v. Lakefield

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 2015No. 20140220PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Greg Grengs appeals from district court orders interpreting Anita Grengs’ will and approving the final accounting and distribution of Anita Grengs’ estate. We hold the option to purchase provision of the will is ambiguous and evidence indicates Anita Grengs intended Greg Grengs have an option to purchase property that was not conditioned on the landowner’s willingness to sell, and the evidence supports the district court’s interpretation of the option to lease provision of the will. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

I

[¶ 2] Anita Grengs had five children, Julie…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Berry-Iverson Co. of North Dakota, Inc. v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Investors Title Insurance Co. v. HerzigNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Matter of Estate of StarcherNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  4. In Re Estate of HassNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Matter of Estate of ZimblemanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Curtiss A. Hogen Trust B v. HogenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Dixon v. DixonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  3. Constellation Development, LLC v. Western Trust Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Estate of KetterlingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Estate of AlmerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API