Legal Opinion

Hays v. M'Clurg

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 15, 1835PublishedCited by 3 opinions

ERROR to the district court of Mleghany county. Alexander M’Clurg against William H. Hays, David Adams, John Feehan, James Taylor, Thomas Taylor and Samual K. Page. Jlsswnpsit on book account. All the facts of this case, and the question which arose, are fully stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Huston, J.

—The only point argued in this court will appear by the following statement. Alexander M’Clurg, as appeared by his books, on the 20th of August 1825, sold to the defendants, then doing business under the name of the Pittsburgh Iron Manufacturing Company, goods to the amount of 770 dollars 50 cents. For this amount the defendants gave their note to M’Clurg & King, payable at six months; and their note was credited in their books. M’Clurg & King were partners in a dry good store ; and it was proved that the note was made payable to M’Clurg &…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Johnson v. WeedNew York Supreme Court · 1812
  2. Holmes v. D'CampNew York Supreme Court · 1806
  3. Schemerhorn v. LoinesNew York Supreme Court · 1810
  4. Kean v. DufresneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1817
  5. Hart v. BollerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1827

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Young v. HibbsNebraska Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Winters v. MowrerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  3. Bantz v. BasnettWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1877

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API