Legal Opinion
Rinker v. United States Ex Rel. Internal Revenue Service (In Re Rinker)
District Court, S.D. Georgia
Decided August 23, 1999No. Bankruptcy No. 96-10326. No. CV 199-071Published
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BOWEN, Chief Judge.
James Anthony Rinker, Sr. (Rinker), appeals an Order of Chief United States Bankruptcy Judge John S. Dalis, entered March 15, 1999, in the above Chapter 7 bankruptcy case. After careful review, the bankruptcy court’s judgment is AFFIRMED for the reasons set forth below.
I. Background Facts
Rinker contends that the Bankruptcy Court erred in granting the Internal Revenue Service’s (IRS) motion for summary judgment. In the Order granting the IRS’s motion, the bankruptcy court determined that all tax obligations, including accrued interest and penalties owed to the IRS for…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kelly v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dwain L. CADDELL, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- Burke v. United States Ex Rel. Internal Revenue Service (In Re Burke)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Georgia · 1996
- In Re Jay S. Soderling, Debtor. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Manager of the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Resolution Fund v. Jay S. Soderling, an Individual, and Evelyn Ruth Soderling, His Spouse, in Re Leif David Soderling, Debtor. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Manager of the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Resolution Fund v. Leif David Soderling, an Individual, and Sydney Lynn Soderling, His Spouse, in Re Evelyn Ruth Soderling, Debtor. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Manager of the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Resolution Fund v. Evelyn Ruth Soderling, an Individual, and Jay S. Soderling, Her Spouse, in Re Sydney Lynn Soderling, Debtor. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Manager of the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Resolution Fund v. Sydney Lynn Soderling, an Individual, and Leif David Soderling, Her SpouseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993