Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Seagraves
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Hall, Judge.
1. The insurer contends that Ga. L. 1966, pp. 609, 660, as amended (Code Ann. § 81A-156 (e)) changes the rule respecting the proof required to defeat a motion for summary judgment when evidence submitted therewith has pierced the pleadings. We disagree. It is merely a statutory amendment to reflect what has already been decided judicially as to the opposing evidence required. Scales v. Peevy, 103 Ga. App. 42, 47 (118 SE2d 193). See 6 Moore’s Federal Practice (2d Ed.) 2021, § 56.01 [14].
2. The insured enumerates as error the admission in evidence and consideration by the court of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Holland v. Sanfax CorporationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Scales v. PeevyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Colonial Stores, Inc. v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- Loomis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
- Todd v. German American InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hopkins v. Life Ins. Co. of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
- Ashley v. Standard Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1969