Legal Opinion

Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Seagraves

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 8, 1968No. 43428PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hall, Judge.

1. The insurer contends that Ga. L. 1966, pp. 609, 660, as amended (Code Ann. § 81A-156 (e)) changes the rule respecting the proof required to defeat a motion for summary judgment when evidence submitted therewith has pierced the pleadings. We disagree. It is merely a statutory amendment to reflect what has already been decided judicially as to the opposing evidence required. Scales v. Peevy, 103 Ga. App. 42, 47 (118 SE2d 193). See 6 Moore’s Federal Practice (2d Ed.) 2021, § 56.01 [14].

2. The insured enumerates as error the admission in evidence and consideration by the court of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Holland v. Sanfax CorporationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  2. Scales v. PeevyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  3. Colonial Stores, Inc. v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  4. Loomis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
  5. Todd v. German American InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hopkins v. Life Ins. Co. of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  2. Ashley v. Standard Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API