Legal Opinion

McConkey Realty Corp. v. Wildermuth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 11, 1925No. 1PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Sears, J.:

By motion for judgment on the pleadings the defendant has challenged the sufficiency of the complaint. It appears from the pleading that the defendant has assigned to the plaintiff a certain bond and mortgage which according to their terms secured the payment of $6,500 and interest. In the written assignment from defendant to the plaintiff the defendant covenanted that there was due and unpaid on the bond and mortgage the sum of $6,500 of principal and $155.46 of interest. The plaintiff paid as consideration for the assignment the full amount covenanted to be due and unpaid. It is…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Delaware Bank v. . JarvisNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  2. Flandrow v. . HammondNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. Bordwell v. . CollieNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  4. Trustees of Broaddus Institute v. SiersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Furniss v. . FergusonNew York Court of Appeals · 1857

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. First National BankDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API