Lampkin v. Spangner

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 TRISHKA LAMPKIN AND ROBERT No. 2:20-cv-01204-JAM-JDP CORTEZ, 10 Plaintiffs, 11 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S v. MOTION FOR SANCTIONS 12 COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, M. SPAGNER 13 in his official capacity, and MATTHEW CORTEZ, 14 Defendants. 15 16 This matter is before the Court on the County of 17 Sacramento’s (“Defendant”) Motion for Sanctions. See Mot. for 18 Sanctions (“Mot.”), ECF No. 14. For the following reasons, 19 Defendant’s motion is granted.1 20 I. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 21 On June 16, 2020,…