Legal Opinion

Scott v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 7, 1984No. 83-2458PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

GRIMES, Acting Chief Judge.

The defendant appeals from his conviction of possession of heroin. We hold that the court properly denied his motion to suppress and his motion for discharge under the speedy trial rule. However, there are two points concerning costs which must be addressed.

*1177The court placed the defendant on probation but over objection imposed as a special condition the requirement that he pay $5,000 court costs on a reasonable monthly basis within the term of the probation. The supreme court has held that even a presently indigent defendant can be required to repay court costs as a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. ByrdSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
  2. Drumm v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  3. Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hankerson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API