Reeves v. State

Blackburn, Presiding Judge.

Following a jury trial, Norris Reeves appeals his conviction of terroristic threats 1 and obstructing or hindering a law enforcement officer, 2 3 contending that the evidence was insufficient to support the jury’s verdict. We disagree and affirm.

On appeal from a criminal conviction, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict and an appellant no longer enjoys the presumption of innocence. This Court determines whether the evidence is sufficient under the standard of Jackson v. Virginia 3 and does not weigh the evidence or determine witness…