Legal Opinion

Wingham v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 31, 2002No. 36A05-0203-PC-132PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GARRARD, Senior Judge.

This is an appeal from the denial of post-conviction relief. In 1998, Wingham was convicted of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated based upon his guilty plea. He subsequently petitioned for post-conviction relief contending that his plea was accepted without an adequate factual basis and while he maintained his innocence. He further argues the plea was not intelligently, knowingly and voluntarily entered.

At the outset, we note that in Indiana there is a legal distinction between a claim that a guilty plea was entered without an adequate factual basis and a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Ross v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
  3. In Re the Arbitration Between Greenberg & Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1987

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Huddleston v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. McWhorter v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Vorice Williams-Bey v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. Phillip Gonzalez v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API