Chase v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIS, Judge.
On appeal from his conviction for driving while under the influence of alcohol, in violation of Code § 18.2-266, Dane Lesley Chase contends the trial court erred by admitting into evidence a breath test certificate showing his blood alcohol content. He argues that the Commonwealth violated his federal and state due process rights by denying him a potentially exculpatory blood test. Because he did not raise the state due process claim at trial, he is barred by Rule 5A:18 from asserting that claim on appeal. Because his federal due process rights were not violated and the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Winston v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1948
- State v. LeonardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
- State v. DakeNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. SidmoreMontana Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. EttoreNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
3Cited by9 opinions
- Nelson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2003
- State v. BenoirSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
- Waters v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2004
- Gheorghiu v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2009
- David Herman Whitt v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.