Legal Opinion

Wolff v. Smith

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1897PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Muskegon; Russell, J. Case by Henry A. Wolff against William H. Smith for slander. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

This is an action of slander, based on language used by the defendant which is said to have amounted to a statement that the plaintiff was a criminal. The plaintiff was a candidate for the office of treasurer of the city of Muskegon, and among the causes of action alleged is a conversation which occurred after his defeat. The alleged slander consisted in statements that the defendant had been informed that the plaintiff was a safe-cracker, and had served time in a penitentiary for safe-blowing. The defendant’s counsel was allowed to show by Mr. Niskern that about three years before the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Welch v. WareMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Maclean v. ScrippsMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Proctor v. HoughtalingMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Huson v. DaleMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
  5. Farr v. RascoMichigan Supreme Court · 1861

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Eikhoff v. GilbertMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Darling v. MansfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API