Hambel v. Hambel
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from MashaU District Gourt. — HoN. Obed "Cas-well, Judge. ActioN for the interpretation of the will of James AY. Hambel, deceased, and for other relief. A demurrer "to the petition was overruled, and, the defendants refusing to plead further, a, decree was rendered in favor of the plaintiffs. The defendants appeal.-
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, C. J.
The will in question was made on the 18th day of January, 1890, and the portions material to a determination of the questions presented are) as follows: "‘First. I devise and bequeath to my wife- Lucelia A. Ham-bel, all my property, both real and personal, of every *460kind and description, that I may own at my decease. Second. I - furtherl direct that at the decease of my said wife all the property then remaining shall be equally divided between my children, except W. O.- Hambel, youngest son, that may be living at the time of my decease. Third. I nominate, and appoint my wife, Lucelia A. Hambel…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Law v. DouglassSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
- Wescott v. BinfordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
- Jordan v. WoodinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
- Rona v. MeierSupreme Court of Iowa · 1878
- Stivers v. GardnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Spaan v. AndersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
- McCulloch's Estate v. ConradSupreme Court of Iowa · 1952
- Meyer v. WeilerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
- Doyle v. AndisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- Ross ex rel. Ross v. AyrhartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.