Kanne v. Kanne
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for the county of Waseca by the trustee in bankruptcy of Frederick F. Kanne against Frederick F. Kanne, Augusta M. Kanne, his wife, Tobias Broadbent and Martha A. Broadbent, to decree that the contract mentioned in the opinion be adjudged null and void, that the property specified in the contract be subject to sale to pay the debts of the bankrupt, and for other and further relief as to the court should seem meet.
Read the full summary
Action in the district court for the county of Waseca by the trustee in bankruptcy of Frederick F. Kanne against Frederick F. Kanne, Augusta M. Kanne, his wife, Tobias Broadbent and Martha A. Broadbent, to decree that the contract mentioned in the opinion be adjudged null and void, that the property specified in the contract be subject to sale to pay the debts of the bankrupt, and for other and further relief as to the court should seem meet. The substance of the allegations of the complaint and answer will be found in the fourth and fifth paragraphs of the opinion. The reply was a denial of…
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
For ten years prior to 1907, the defendant Frederick F. Kanne conducted a private bank in partnership with his son, Albert J., the latter having the active management thereof. For some years prior to March 21, 1905, Frederdick F. Kanne had been the owner of a farm near Waterville, Minnesota, worth between $5,000 and $6,000. On that date he and his wife entered into a contract to convey this farm to their daughter and son-in-law, the two other defendants herein, in consideration of certain covenants therein contained. No •money consideration was paid. The covenants or agreements in the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Harper v. CarrollSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Love v. FrancisMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- National German-American Bank v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
- McCord v. KnowltonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Halbert v. PrankeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Virtue v. Creamery Package Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Flowers v. GermannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- Majestic Inc. v. BerryCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- Mannheimer v. PhinneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926