Legal Opinion

Chaney v. Maupin

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 30, 1941No. 13019PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YOUNG, Justice.

This is a suit for balance due on a second vendor’s lien and deed of trust note, after non-judicial foreclosure. On April 9, 1929, appellees (plaintiffs below) sold to appellants (defendants) a part of Lot 28, Block “A” of Ross Avenue Annex, an addition to the City of Dallas, by metes and bounds (according to Vol. 1, page 310, Dallas County Map Records), the vendees in the transaction assuming a $10,000 note of W. A. and S. B. Maupin to the Federal Mortgage Company; and executing a $3,500 second lien note due in five years. On April 18, 1934, the note last mentioned was renewed…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Estelle v. HartTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  2. Bailey v. BlockTexas Supreme Court · 1911
  3. American National Bank v. CrugerTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Allen v. GarrisonTexas Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Hart v. EstelleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Maupin v. ChaneyTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Kimberly Development Corp. v. First State Bank of Greens BayouCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  3. Kimberly Development Corp. v. First State Bank of Greens BayouCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API