Johnson v. E.I. Dupont Denemours & Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
WALTER J. ROTHSCHILD, Judge.
|2In this class action litigation, plaintiffs appeal the trial court’s judgment in favor of defendant, E.I. DuPont deNemours and Company (hereinafter referred to as “Du-pont”), in which the trial court found that plaintiffs did not meet their burden of proof at trial and dismissed their claims against defendant. For the following reasons, we affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The named plaintiffs in this litigation are Michael Johnson, Sandra Johnson, Carol Lennix, Lathaniel Lennix, Louis Lennix, Jr., Brad Arceneaux, Eric Arcen-eaux, and Roland Arceneaux. On August…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Wainwright v. FontenotSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
- Lasha v. Olin Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Cheairs v. State Ex Rel. DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
- Magee v. PittmanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Jones v. Capitol Enterprises, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
- State v. FrancoisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- In re Lipitor (Atorvastatin Calcium) Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2017
- Cambre v. St. John the Baptist ParishLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
- In re Lipitor (Atorvastatin Calcium) Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2017
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.