Legal Opinion

Johnson v. E.I. Dupont Denemours & Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 13, 2009No. 08-CA-628PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTER J. ROTHSCHILD, Judge.

|2In this class action litigation, plaintiffs appeal the trial court’s judgment in favor of defendant, E.I. DuPont deNemours and Company (hereinafter referred to as “Du-pont”), in which the trial court found that plaintiffs did not meet their burden of proof at trial and dismissed their claims against defendant. For the following reasons, we affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The named plaintiffs in this litigation are Michael Johnson, Sandra Johnson, Carol Lennix, Lathaniel Lennix, Louis Lennix, Jr., Brad Arceneaux, Eric Arcen-eaux, and Roland Arceneaux. On August…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  2. Wainwright v. FontenotSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
  3. Lasha v. Olin Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  4. Cheairs v. State Ex Rel. DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
  5. Magee v. PittmanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Jones v. Capitol Enterprises, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. State v. FrancoisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. In re Lipitor (Atorvastatin Calcium) Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2017
  4. Cambre v. St. John the Baptist ParishLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. In re Lipitor (Atorvastatin Calcium) Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2017

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API