Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Peterson
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided February 27, 2004No. 1021913Published
1Opinion of the Court
890 So.2d 990 (2004)
Ex parte Charles PETERSON.
(In re Charles Peterson
v.
State of Alabama).
1021913.
Supreme Court of Alabama.
February 27, 2004.
Rehearing Denied April 30, 2004.
Richard K. Keith and Daniel G. Hamm of Keith & Hamm, P.C., Montgomery, for petitioner.
William H. Pryor, Jr., atty. gen., and Andy Scott Poole and Cecil G. Brendle, Jr., asst. attys. gen., for respondent.
WOODALL, Justice.
Charles Peterson petitions this Court for a writ of mandamus directing the Montgomery Circuit Court to dismiss his indictment. We grant the petition.
For the factual background of this case, see Peterson v.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Stroud v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Ross v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1988
- United States Ex Rel. Robert Williams v. Hon. Daniel McMann Warden of Auburn State Prison, Auburn, New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Ex Parte ColeSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
- Ex Parte RiceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.