Mitchell v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ERVIN, Judge.
We affirm the summary denial of appellant’s motion to correct illegal sentence, *1085because appellant has failed to show how his Leon County sentences are illegal. The 35-year sentences for the armed robbery convictions were within the statutory maximum,1 and, in accordance with the plea, the Leon County sentences were directed to be served concurrently to the sentences imposed in Du-val County. To the extent appellant attempts to attack the legality of the 75-year Duval County murder sentence, such is a matter that can only be raised before the Duval County Circuit Court.
As for…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Hinson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998