Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Eisenberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 1, 2012PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Surrogate’s Court, New York County (Kristen Booth Glen, S.), entered July 18, 2011, which granted the motion of respondent cotrustee Citigroup, Inc. (Citigroup) to dismiss petitioner law office’s (Yerma) petition to the extent of holding the petition in abeyance pending resolution of a voluntary accounting proceeding commenced by Citigroup to determine the legal fees earned by several counsel, including Yerma, which concurrently represented respondent cotrustee Etsuko Hamada in her fiduciary capacity, and which directed Yerma to supplement its petition to clarify the legal services she…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pyle v. PyleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  2. Pyle v. . PyleNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  3. In re PhelanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  4. In Re Estate of WallensNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. State v. Philip Morris Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Henderson-Jones v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. Ex parte Steve Marshall, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Alabama (In re: Megan Carmack and Leigh Gully Manning, individually and on behalf of minor children, Michaelyn Leigh Manning and Michael Sanders Manning v. Regions Bank, in its fiduciary capacity as trustee of the Mabel Amos Memorial Fund) (Montgomery Circuit Court: CV-22-900830) and (In re: Tyra Lindsey, a minor, by and through her mother and guardian, Denese Rankin; and Steve Marshall, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Alabama v. Regions Bank, in its fiduciary capacity as trustee of the Mabel Amos Memorial Fund) (Montgomery Circuit Court: CV-23-900219).Supreme Court of Alabama · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API